Shantanu Das

Read the articles by Shantanu Das in the Aviator blog. Get professional advice on software product deployment, testing, and other engineering topics.

Code Ownership: Using CODEOWNERS Strategically

Code ownership boosts accountability and speeds up reviews. Use CODEOWNERS strategically to align teams, reduce delays, and keep your codebase healthy.
Read the articles by Shantanu Das in the Aviator blog. Get professional advice on software product deployment, testing, and other engineering topics.
Avatar photo

Shantanu Das

Read the articles by Shantanu Das in the Aviator blog. Get professional advice on software product deployment, testing, and other engineering topics.

Top 8 KPIs for Release Management

kpis for release management
Release management ensures smooth software deployments with minimal disruptions. Tracking key KPIs like Deployment Frequency, Change Failure Rate (CFR), and MTTR helps teams improve efficiency, reduce downtime, and enhance stability. In this blog, we break down the top 8 KPIs that drive successful releases.

Monorepo vs Polyrepo: Which Repository Strategy is Right for Your Team?

Monorepo vs Polyrepo
Shifting from a monorepo to a polyrepo isn't just a matter of splitting code it's a rewrite of your entire developer workflow. Dependency boundaries, shared libraries, and tightly coupled CI/CD pipelines often make the transition painful. In this post, we explore when each model works best, why companies like Facebook and Netflix took different paths, and what to consider before making the switch.

Automated Failover and Git Rollback Strategies with GitOps and Argo Rollouts

git rollback strategies
When Kubernetes deployments fail due to misconfigurations, manual rollbacks are slow and disruptive. GitOps, with ArgoCD and Argo Rollouts, automates failover by detecting issues and reverting to the last stable version. ArgoCD enforces Git as the source of truth, while Argo Rollouts manages progressive deployments, preventing faulty updates from reaching users and ensuring rapid recovery.

Why Trunk-Based Development Is Key to Successful Continuous Delivery

continuous delivery with trunk based development
Trunk-based development enables faster, more reliable software deployment by making frequent, small commits to the main branch. This approach minimizes integration issues, supports continuous delivery, and enhances stability through automation, feature flags, and short-lived branches. This blog explores how trunk-based development aligns with CI/CD pipelines and offers best practices and tools to optimize workflows and maintain build stability.

Impact of Flaky Tests in Merge Queue

Flaky tests, which fail unpredictably without changes in code or environment, can cause significant delays in development. They disrupt merge queues by blocking valid pull requests, leading to resets, wasted resources, and frustration among developers. Merge queues are designed to streamline the integration process, but flaky tests undermine their efficiency. Tools like Aviator MergeQueue help manage these challenges with features such as parallel testing and early validation. By addressing flaky tests and stabilizing testing environments, teams can ensure smoother workflows and more reliable CI/CD pipelines.
Subscribe

Be the first to know once we publish a new blog post

Join our Discord

Learn best practices from modern engineering teams

Get a free 30-min consultation with the Aviator team to improve developer experience across your organization.

Powered by WordPress